Monday, May 20, 2019
Management and Lego Media Int Essay
MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC1. imbibe the organisational polish at Matsushita Electric Company (MEC). In what ways has it historically been innovative? Give examples (at least two).2. a) Describe MECs journey into internationalization.b) Where would you elucidate them now in terms of their phase of intl development?c) And how would you classify their managerial mindset (parochial? Ethnocentric? Geocentric?)?Give historical examples (& contrast w/r/t the companys tenets of globalization) to support your answers (to each of a,b,c above).3. As of the late 1990s (post KMs death), how swell has corporate counseling succeeded in propagating KMs approach to innovation beyond the Japanese civilization? Give specific examples of successes and/or challenges.Q4. What is needed to improve cross- heathenish management within MEC?CASE deuceLEGOWhat are LEGOs values and corporate identity? How did these develop over time (prior to LEGO Media Intl)?How did Legos organisational structures & policies per mit intl alignment AND explicitly reflect the companys belief in equifinality?How did LEGO actively reduce barriers to communication? Give examples of some of their internal communication practices & indicate which communication barriers these practices helped to reduce.Describe the organizational culture UK Lego (Lego media Intl). What is the evidence that it, too, believed in equifinality? When you compare it to the corporate LEGO identity, would you say that this (UK Lego culture) is an example of Corporate (Danish) LEGOs pagan dominance? Cultural avoidance? Cultural accommodation? Cultural Compromise? Or Cultural synergism? Explain why it represents the form of c/c conflict resolution that youve said it does.CSE THREENOVO NORDISKWhat problems/challenges did NN stage prior to facilitation?Describe how the facilitating team was created (nature of its diversity/homogeneity, and how people were selected into it). Was this consistent with the best practices for creation of multic ultural teams? Explain.What was/were the objective(s) of the facilitation movement? Was it a routine or innovative task?Describe the process by which the NN facilitation team managed cultural differences _(BETWEEN THE MEMBERS OF THE TEAM AND THE UNIT/PROCESS GROUP THEY WERE FACILITATING)_ . Give specific examples to illustrate their methods of differentiation, integration, and their use of external feedback.Whats the evidence that the facilitation team succeeded? Explain in terms of both task outcomes (alignment to corporate goals) & social outcomes (emergent states of joint trust, collective identity, and confidence in the facilitating teams ability to achieve its task).Can C/C Management via the NN style of facilitation be a way of accomplishing alignment in other (non-Danish) MNCs? Why/why not?CASE FOURSULZER INFRAWhat problems was Sulzer Infra facing prior to creating its new vision? Were these well-structured or ill-structured problems (Explain)? How did it come to recognize these as problems?What was the new Vision about? & What challenge did it present?How did the Vision/ system 2002 schedule & Sulzer Infra Academy set about trying to meet those objectives? Specifically, (a) who was involved ? (b) what were the 4 study elements of knowledge acquisition that were intended? And (c) What was the main focus of each of the 3 days?What was the intended single-valued function of the arts component of the program? What were the intended functions of theP-teams & the Know-How ring? In what ways were they meant to cooperate?Throughout the program, what helped to yoke c/c differences and which c/c issues remained a challenge?From the perspectives of the UK & Dutch offices, to what extent were knowledge management objectives (e.g., dissemination & utilization goals) achieved by the program? Based on these views, how could Sulzer Infra have improved their program?CASE FIVEPURIFYING AN IMAGEWhat responsibilities do organizations have to customers who rely on a job of products, one of which has exhibited a fatal, but potentially solvable, defect?Did Baxter accept responsibility for the deaths too quickly?How in person responsible is a CEO for a localized product-liability issue?Was Baxter ethically obligated to close Romney sow?Could Baxter have ethically attempted to shift blame for the dialyzer defects to 3M or to the organization that owned the Romney ingraft a few months before the crisis?What ethical responsibility did Baxter owe to the employees at the Romney Plant that it closed in the wake of the Dialyzer crisis?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.